Megan’s Law: Sex Offenders in Our Midst

With the Sandusky trial uppermost in the news and  recent pro-pedophilia comments   to “Pedophilia -Time to Normalize?  orginally posted on FOTM last August,  the following  information is provided as a public service.  I suggest you bookmark the Family Watchdog website and share it as widely as possible.

Check out the Family Watchd0g website.  It provides a Searchable/Map to identify the location of registered sex offenders who may live in your neighborhood.  I live within a mile of elementary, middle school and high school.  I just did a search and found the mugshot and case details of one individual convicted of indecent exposure who lives next door to a Christian Teen Center about 3 blocks from the high school. 

offender counts

This list contains the actual number of offenders that are publicly viewable in the official state registries.

state	number of offenders	population in thousands	offenders per million
ALABAMA	9843	4631	2125.5
ALASKA	2945	700	4207.1
ARIZONA	4800	5230	917.8
ARKANSAS	5831	2750	2120.4
CALIFORNIA	65884	34441	1913
COLORADO	131	4468	29.3
CONNECTICUT	5506	3317	1659.9
DELAWARE	3244	800	4055
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA	914	529	1727.8
FLORIDA	57362	16279	3523.7
GEORGIA	63	8413	7.5
HAWAII	3339	1342	2488.1
IDAHO	3647	1480	2464.2
ILLINOIS	25736	12266	2098.2
INDIANA	11579	6215	1863.1
IOWA	5442	2941	1850.4
KANSAS	6489	2761	2350.2
KENTUCKY	481	4098	117.4
LOUISIANA	10905	4535	2404.6
MAINE	2921	1285	2273.2
MARYLAND	7953	5467	1454.7
MASSACHUSETTS	3497	6310	554.2
MICHIGAN	36835	9763	3772.9
MINNESOTA	256	5005	51.1
MISSISSIPPI	7072	2908	2431.9
MISSOURI	13784	5718	2410.6
MONTANA	2134	1006	2121.3
NEBRASKA	3848	1761	2185.1
NEVADA	3375	2070	1630.4
NEW HAMPSHIRE	2192	1281	1711.2
NEW JERSEY	34	8392	4.1
NEW MEXICO	2680	2016	1329.4
NEW YORK	19839	18250	1087.1
NORTH CAROLINA	18692	8227	2272
NORTH DAKOTA	456	677	673.6
OHIO	19580	11428	1713.3
OKLAHOMA	7181	3491	2057
OREGON	690	3613	191
PENNSYLVANIA	11866	12281	966.2
RHODE ISLAND	478	1012	472.3
SOUTH CAROLINA	11557	4033	2865.6
SOUTH DAKOTA	2966	810	3661.7
TENNESSEE	18482	5966	3097.9
TEXAS	68680	21487	3196.4
UTAH	7269	2411	3014.9
VERMONT	1419	638	2224.1
VIRGINIA	18646	7324	2545.9
WASHINGTON	6424	6258	1026.5
WEST VIRGINIA	3413	1849	1845.9
WISCONSIN	20708	5479	3779.5
WYOMING	1542	568	2714.8

 

 

© Copyright 2005-2012, FWD Holdings Incorporated, All Rights

Teacher fed semen to kids in Los Angeles elementary school

Here’s Reason No. 1,002 to home school your kids.

The entire staff of 88 will be replaced at Miramonte Elementary School in a poor and mainly Latino neighborhood of Los Angeles, California, where two teachers sexually abused pupils and spoon-fed them semen. So reports the UK’s Daily Mail on Feb. 8, 2012.

Mark Berndt

61-year-old teacher Mark Berndt, who had taught at the school for 32 years, was charged with carrying out lewd acts on 23 children, aged 6 to 10, between 2005 and 2010. He allegedly blindfolded the students in his classroom and fed them his semen with a spoon in a “tasting game.”

This goes beyond “mere” pedophilia. Only the deeply malevolent and demonic can blindfold and feed semen to little children.

Berndt remains jailed on $23 million bail and could face life imprisonment if convicted.

According to Jeffrey Scott Shapiro of Big Government, Feb. 6, 2012, Berndt evaded actual termination from the Los Angeles Unified School District enabling him to retain his lifetime health benefits.

It was a film processor who reported Berndt to the police after the processor saw a film roll of 40 pictures depicting Berndt blindfolding young girls and taping their mouths shut. Police later found 400 more incriminating photos in Berndt’s home. The charges Berndt currently faces are for acts from 2008-2010.

Here’s one of the photos, showing Berndt dressed in tights as Mickey Mouse, with his left arm around a little girl, and holding a semen-laced cookie in his right hand:

According to a Los Angeles Times report:

Some photos allegedly showed Berndt with his arm around children or his hand over their mouths. Other photos showed children with live bugs the size of hissing cockroaches on their mouths or faces.

Others depicted girls with what appears to be a spoon up to their mouths as if they were going to ingest a clear-white liquid. Children were fed Berndt’s semen from a spoon or on cookies, investigators said.

Kids reported being fed something distasteful. A blue plastic spoon and container found in the trash in his classroom tested positive for his semen, authorities said.

The kids reportedly told police their teacher said it was a game and the substance was “sugar.”

KTTV in Los Angeles reported that this is not the first time Berndt was investigated for sexual abuse. In January 1994 Berndt was investigated for sexual misconduct by the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Office, but charges were not filed by the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office.

Martin Springer

Police arrested another Miramonte Elementary School teacher, 49-year-old Martin Springer, who taught second grade and had been at Miramonte for his entire career. He is accused of fondling two girls in his classroom, and is held on $2 million bail. The school board discussed firing him in a closed-door meeting yesterday.

Investigators said they know of no connection between the Miramonte cases. Berndt and Springer know each other and took their classes on at least two joint field trips in the past decade, according to the Los Angeles Times.

The 88 teachers and 40 support staff at Miramonte are being replaced because a full investigation of allegations is disruptive and staffers will require support to get through the scandal, Superintendent John Deasy told parents. All employees will report to another location, where they will be interviewed. They will be paid during the investigation. Officials don’t know how long the investigation will take.

An entire staff has been trained to come into Miramonte’s classrooms to take over teaching for the time being and there will be a psychiatric social worker in every classroom to help students and staff cope with any issues.

Some of the parents and students of Miramonte

~Eowyn

Why Are Our Babies Getting Hepatitis-B Vaccination?

Hepatitis B is an infectious illness caused by the hepatitis B virus (HBV) which infects the liver. The disease has caused epidemics in parts of Asia and Africa, and is endemic in China. About a quarter of the world’s population, more than 2 billion people, have been infected with the hepatitis-B virus. This includes 350 million chronic carriers of the virus.

Perinatal infection is a major route of infection in endemic (mainly poor developing) countries, not the United States. Unless infected by the birth mother, however, hepatitis B is rarely found in children. While viral DNA has been detected in the saliva, tears, and urine of chronic carriers, transmission of hepatitis B virus results from exposure to infectious blood or body fluids such as semen and vaginal fluids. Hepatitis B viruses cannot be spread by casual contact, such as holding hands, sharing eating utensils or drinking glasses, breast-feeding, kissing, hugging, coughing, or sneezing. [Source: Wikipedia]

In other words, in the United States, hepatitis B is a sexually-transmitted disease.

Given that, why is our government mandating all healthy babies be vaccinated against hepatitis-B, a sexually-transmitted disease?

Dr. Judith A. Reisman writes that in 1991, without public vote,  anonymous health bureaucrats in the Center for Disease Control initiated ‘aids to prevent [hepatitis B] venereal disease’ for all American newborns. By 1994 most states silently implemented hepatitis B vaccinations for neonates, often within 12 hours of birth born to uninfected mothers. By April 1998, 35 USA states reported that they had ‘hepB childhood vaccination mandates’ with the CDC declaring that 80% plus of American infants and children, ages 19-35 months had received hepatitis B shots.

There is no evidence to suggest that the parents of these children were told that a) hepatitis B is a sexually transmitted diseaseresulting from promiscuous homo/heterosexual conduct as well as commonly sex-related IV drug use or b) that such universal vaccinations are experimental.

Dr. Reisman then quotes from an article in the July 31, 1998 Science magazine, on hepatitis B vaccine being suspected for triggering multiple sclerosis-like symptoms:

“Critics blame the widely used vaccine for many ills….Concern about the vaccine appeared early in France….[with] data on more than 600 cases of illnesses, many with MS-like symptoms in people who had received the hepatitis B vaccine. In addition, patient advocacy groups in Britain and Canada have studied more than 100 cases each, as has ….Bonnie Dunbar, a molecular biologist at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston…..[who] is motivated by personal experience: Her brother developed immune problems that she believes were triggered by the hepatitis B shots he had to get when he became a health care worker. Dunbar says that when she began investigating, she found that other medical colleagues had experienced or knew about such reactions. One nurse, for example, attributed a dozen cases of MS to vaccination….A grant application [she and another "hepatitis virus expert"] submitted to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has been turned down twice….”

Dr. Reisman then points out that pedophile organizations (groups that work to legalize adult-child sex) have long campaigned for “A Child’s Sexual Bill of Rights” to legalize sex “with a parent, sibling or other responsible adult or child” and that such sex be “protected and aided….with contraceptives and aids to prevent venereal disease.”

Instead of aggressively arresting and imprisoning child sex criminals, is the government’s hepatitis B vaccination program making children physically “safe” for pedophiles? Are pro-pedophile pediatric authorities (e.g., Johns Hopkins’ Dr. John Money, who in a Journal of Paedophilia interview, demanded an end to age of consent laws, adult-child sex at all ages, and pushing for pedophile rights) behind the perilous universal vaccinations of infants and children for “hep B” and other sexually transmitted diseases?

In their widely popular second edition of Nutritional Healing, Balach and Balach (1997) reported that roughly “85 percent of gay men are infected with hepatitis B.“

With no recorded cases of hepatitis B among chaste infants and children of commonly healthy mothers, the question must be asked as to why most states now mandate or coerce parents into vaccinating their infants and children with a serum created largely for prostitutes and promiscuous male homosexuals — and a vaccine the side effects of which are largely unknown.

Although increased rates of MS, asthma, Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, Attention Deficit Disorders and other afflictions have been implicated in hepatitis B vaccinations, its gross and subtle effects on injected children will not be known for many, many decades–if ever. Still, millions of infants are being injected, allegedly for their own good, with a sexual prophylactic, toxic in its natural form. Who are these injections designed to protect?

Read about the Child Sexual Bill of Rights, here.

Read about Massachusetts schools giving condoms to first grade schoolchildren, here.

~Eowyn

Condom-Shaped Candy Sold to Kids – in America

To be enticing, candy for little kiddies typically are cute-looking. An example are these Gummi Bears jelly candy:

So why are candies shaped as condoms being sold to kids?

On August 24, 2011, in his article “Condom-Shaped Candy Points to Pedophile Future” for henrymakow.com, Aspen writes: “Ever-new ways to saturate children’s minds with sex are being enacted with increasing pace. Anyone who doubts that there is a concerted effort to sexualize children need look no further than Asian candy shops for proof.”

To make his point, Aspen describes his shocking discovery that this condom-shaped candy is sold at child-height in Japanese supermarkets:

Aspen also points out that the “Delicious” brand new for the condom-shaped candy is printed in a font identical to that of Durex Condoms.

So I went looking for an image of Durex. Indeed, the “Delicious” brand name has the same font as the “Durex” brand name on this box of fruit-flavored (!) condoms:

The condom-shaped candy is a product of Sophisca Confectionery Corporation that Aspen claims to be “a Japan-based manufacturer and retailer of candies and sweets.”

So I went looking for Sophisca on the web.

I couldn’t find any Sophisca in Japan. Instead, I found Sophisca Confectionery Corporation as having a single location, in Taipei, Taiwan. This website says Sophisca registered its trademark with the U.S. government on September 15, 2003, and that the corporation’s “goods and services” are “candy; chocolate; rice-based snack foods; cookies; ice cream; sugar; honey; puddings; coffee; bread; cakes.”

Sophisca is a Taiwanese, not Japanese, corporation. This is Sophisca’s website, in mainly Chinese language. Here’s how Sophisca describes itself:

“In 1997, Taiwan’s first specialized candy store was born. Sophisca firmly upholds the principle that candies are not delimited or confined by national borders. We offer some 1,000 varieties of hard and soft candy, marshmallow, chocolate, healthy fruits, and honey — all manufactured in Taiwan, with the technology and market acumen of Japan and West Europe.”

Sophisca calls itself “A sweet place for sweethearts” and has this cute little lamb logo, which you can see for yourself on Sophisca’s Facebook page:

But the truth is even worse than Aspen believes. Sophisca’s condom-shaped candy is not sold in Japan and Taiwan because Sophisca has a presence in the United States — in California:

Sophisca Corp. (specializing in “gift baskets and parcels”):
629 W. Duarte Rd., Arcadia, CA 91007
(626) 446-1300

250 W Valley Blvd.
San Gabriel, CA 91776

Sophisca Candy & Gifts
2800 N Main St, STE 2086B
Santa Ana,  CA  92705-6609
(714) 564-9350

Aspen found that Sophisca has an entire line of sex and medical imitation candy products, clearly designed to attract the attention of young people. Many of these products are arranged on shelves low enough for children under the age of 10 to reach. They include:

• BIAGRA – These are ‘Viagra’-shaped candies, with the word “Biagra” stamped on each individual piece. They come 25 in a bottle. The “Bi-” could be a reference to “bi-sexual”.

• MOLTOSE – These items are not really “candy”, but a sweet jelly. The jelly is packaged in a plastic syringe, in the fashion of medical syringes. To ingest the jelly, children push the plunger and squirt the jelly into their mouths. Clearly, these items are meant to accustom young people to a life of drug taken.

• UPUP – The “up” here is breast support provided by bras. This is evidenced by the picture on the box cover: breasts supported by a lacy pink bra. Of course, the faux brand name may serve as a double-entendre for erections, and perhaps as a triple-entendre for the act of sex itself. The candy itself is a set of individually-wrapped nude but armless female busts, complete with breasts and nipples.

• OK – The box for this product has been designed to look like a box of bandages. A small cartoon image also graces face of the box:  it’s a cute little blonde girl in a nurse costume, and holding a syringe. Beneath the faux brand name is printed “QUEER-AID”. The candy itself is comparatively innocuous, being colored bandage-shaped tabs. I am not sure how bandages amount to aid for “queers”.

• PLAYCHOCO - The packaging is a thin box with a “Playboy Magazine”-styled cover. The “magazine” name is printed in the “Playboy” font. While the Chinese script on the cover is not child-oriented, the image depicted is clearly a racily-dressed infant. The candy is chocolates, some of which have been shaped to resemble phalluses and breasts.

Aspen writes that he’s seen children as young as 10 years old buying these candies. He concludes:

“as children are drawn further and further into the world of sex, earlier and earlier sexual activation will be inevitable. Eventually, the sexual rights of children will arise, and powerful forces will emerge step to support and defend those rights. Eventually child sex will be normalized and customary, and following that, it will be encouraged directly by teachers and parents. [...] This is the plan for the future.”

As a matter of fact, the effort to “normalize” child sex and pedophilia is already underway here in the United States.

On August 17, 2011, the pedophile group B4U-ACT hosted a conference attended by some 50 individuals, including a number of admitted pedophiles – or “Minor-Attracted Persons” as they prefer to be identified – as well as several supportive mental health professionals. The consensus of the conference is that pedophilia should be removed as a mental disorder from the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), in the same manner homosexuality was removed in 1973.

~Eowyn

“Human Rights” for Pedophiles

Lunatic Judge

This is just about the most disgusting thing I’ve ever heard.  They have gone straight up crazy over in the UK.

Rules on pedophiles seeing their children relaxed after judges decide their human rights are more important

Over in the United Kingdom, restrictions on pedophiles using the internet and seeing their own children have been torn up after judges ruled their human rights are more important. The Court of Appeal has overturned powers introduced by the last government to protect children from abuse following a landmark legal challenge.

Four men convicted of viewing child pornography online argued it would breach their “right to a family life” to keep them apart from their children and stop them surfing the web. In a controversial move, the Court of Appeal said judges should no longer impose total bans on sex offenders accessing the internet. Pedophiles have also won the right to have unsupervised access to their children as it would breach their human rights to keep them apart, judges said.

They ruled the ‘right to a family life’ must be taken into account before Sexual Offences Prevention Orders (SOPO) are issued. The decision by three appeal judges, led by Lord Justice Hughes, will seriously weaken the ability of the courts to place restrictions on offenders.

Last night Philip Davies MP said: ‘This is very worrying. What concerns me is the criminal justice system always seems to put the rights of the criminal ahead of the public and victim. It risks creating a terrible victim of crime, which could be completely avoidable. That to me is unforgivable.’

One of those who brought the challenge was Wayne Clarke, 34, who was convicted in 2006. He had been traced to North Wales after breaching his bail and found to have a stash of electronic equipment containing photos and videos of young girls engaged in sexual acts. He had been in touch with a mother of a four-year-old girl and had sent her child pornography.

The Court of Appeal ruled the terms of Clarke’s SOPO were “wider than necessary” and a blanket internet ban on him was “disproportionate”. Conditions of the SOPO which prevented any social contact with boys was also ‘unnecessary and unrealistic’ as it would prevent Clarke from having ‘ordinary family contact with his brother and nephews’.

What about the human rights of innocent children? How in the world does surfing the internet for pornography enhance the “family life” of a convicted pedophile? What mother in their right mind would dare leave their child alone, unsupervised, with a convicted pedophile?

I just can’t believe what is happening in our world today.  Don’t you forego certain rights if you are a criminal? The freaks and criminals are no longer being required to face the consequences of their actions. Lunatic judges have placed the “human rights” mantra above all that is good, failing to protect children from evil.

DCG