Tag Archives: big government

How bankrupt govt steals your money in 8 steps

big-government

As news on the Great Cyprus Bank Robbery keep getting worse, the latest being the country’s corrupt finance minister Michael Sarris saying that as much as 80% of “large” bank deposits can be confiscated, Americans should be on the alert to copycat moves by our feral government and bankers. All the more because the American Left are applauding the theft of Cypriots’ bank savings.

Tyler Durden of ZeroHedge warns us that when bankrupt insolvent governments “run out of fingers to plug the dikes,” history shows that they fall back on a very limited playbook.

Simon Black of Sovereign Man blog has enumerated 8 steps in the playbook of bankrupt governments:

1. Direct confiscation: As Cyprus showed us, bankrupt governments are quite happy to plunder people’s bank accounts, especially if it’s a wealthy minority. Aside from bank levies, though, this also includes things like seizing retirement accounts (Argentina), increases in civil asset forfeiture (United States), and gold criminalization.

big govt

2. Taxes: Just another form of confiscation, taxation plunders the hard work and talent of the citizenry. But thanks to decades of brainwashing, it’s more socially acceptable. We’ve come to regard taxes as a ‘necessary evil,’ not realizing that the country existed for decades, even centuries, without an income tax. Yet when bankrupt governments get desperate enough, they begin imposing new taxes… primarily WEALTH taxes (Argentina) or windfall profits taxes (United States in the 1970s).

3. Inflation: This is indirect confiscation– the slow, gradual plundering of people’s savings. Again, governments have been quite successful at inculcating a belief that inflation is also a necessary evil. They’re also adept at fooling people with phony inflation statistics.

4. Capital Controls: Governments can, do, and will restrict the free-flow of capital across borders. They’ll prevent you from moving your own money to a safer jurisdiction, forcing you to keep your hard earned savings at home where it can be plundered and devalued. We’re seeing this everywhere in the developed world… from withdrawal limits in Europe to cash-sniffing dogs at border checkpoints. And it certainly doesn’t help when everyone from the IMF to Nobel laureate Paul Krugman argue in favor of Capital Controls.

5. Wage and Price controls: When even the lowest common denominator in society realizes that prices are getting higher, governments step in and ‘fix’ things by imposing price controls. Occasionally this also includes wage controls… though wage increases tend to be vastly outpaced by price increases. Of course, as any basic economics textbook can illustrate, price controls never work and typically lead to shortages and massive misallocations.

6. Wage and Price controls– on STEROIDS: When the first round of price controls don’t work, the next step is to impose severe penalties for not abiding by the terms. In the days of Diocletian’s Edict on Prices in the 4th century AD, any Roman caught violating the price controls was put to death. In post-revolutionary France, shopkeepers who violated the “Law of Maximum” were fleeced of their private property… and a national spy system was put into place to enforce the measures.

7. Increased regulation: Despite being completely broke, governments will dramatically expand their ranks in a last desperate gasp to envelop the problem in sheer size. In the early 1920s, for example, the number of bureaucratic officials in the German Weimar Republic increased 242%, even though the country was flat broke from its World War I reparation payments and hyperinflation episode. The increase in both regulations and government officials criminalizes and/or controls almost every aspect of our existence… from what we can/cannot put in our bodies to how we are allowed to raise our own children.

8. War and National Emergency: When all else fails, just invade another country. Pick a fight. Keep people distracted by working them into a frenzy over men in caves… or some completely irrelevant island.

~Eowyn

Will Dems Pay for Passing Obamacare in 2014?

Obama_witch_doctor

Disaster for Dems

ObamaCare & the 2014 vote

  • By BETSY MCCAUGHEY
  • Last Updated: 12:09 AM, March 25, 2013
  • Posted: 10:42 PM, March 24, 2013
headshot

Betsy McCaughey

Democrats hope to retake the House of Representatives in next year’s elections. They won’t — and they’ll have themselves to blame, because 2014 is when ObamaCare kicks in.

With a vengeance.

The authors of the Obama health law postponed the pain until after the 2012 election. Some popular provisions went into effect immediately, such as allowing children to stay on their parent’s plan until age 26. And the White House granted 1,472 waivers to various companies and unions, exempting them from insurance reforms so they wouldn’t drop coverage for employees and members before the presidential contest.

Kiss of death: ObamaCare’s disastrous impact means Nancy Pelosi, here being greeted by the president last year, won’t be speaker again soon.

AFP/Getty Images
Kiss of death: ObamaCare’s disastrous impact means Nancy Pelosi, here being greeted by the president last year, won’t be speaker again soon.

Yet a majority of voters on Election Day still opposed the health law (though, obviously, it wasn’t the deciding issue in the presidential race). And opinion will only sour more as the law takes full force starting in January.

People in their 20s and 30s will be clobbered — their health-insurance premiums will double (or more), insurers report. Nineteen percent of the president’s 2012 voters came from this age group. The biggest problem: The Obama law forces insurers to charge young, healthy people more to cover the cost of insuring the middle-aged and those with pre-existing conditions.

Middle-aged folks will benefit somewhat from overcharging the young, but the law’s mandatory benefits package and its billions in new taxes on insurers will drive up costs enough that overall premiums for a family of five will start at $20,000 (before subsidies, if any). Oh — and that doesn’t count the penalty for each smoker, roughly $3,000 a head.

(Subsidies may help some people cover sky-high premiums, though not the smoking penalty — but the letter of the law makes those subsidies unavailable in many states. The federal courts will eventually decide the issue.)

Many workers in industries such as retail, hospitality and home care will lose on-the-job health coverage, forecasts the ADP Research Institute — and many will also be demoted to part-time status because of ObamaCare.

Why? The president’s health law mandates that all employers with 50 or more full-time workers provide its “essential benefit package” if they offer insurance — and that package costs about twice what these industries now offer. Many employers will drop coverage, and pay the (smaller) fine; others will try to avoid that 50-employee limit by using more people part-time.

Even the government’s actuaries admit fewer people will get coverage at work after the employer mandate goes into effect than if the law had not passed.

You will find the rest of the article at this link.

Obamacare

I am praying Betsy McCaughey is right, as it appears the current congress cannot bring itself to even throw a speed bump in front of Obama’s health care plan from Hell. Okay, it really is not Obama’s plan, as it was written many moons ago and has been sitting in a rusty file cabinet ever since, but he will be forever associated with it.

There is just one teeny, tiny problem, though, as filling out an Obamacare application will include an opportunity to register to vote.

That could end up being a double edged sword given the low-information electorate we now have in this country.

And do not even get me started on the potential for voter fraud.

-Dave

“We all need a bit of nannying”

PIERS MORGAN: I disagree with you. I think people need them occasionally, particularly on issues like smoking, drinking, guzzling sodas too big for them, you know, eating 16 Big Macs a day, whatever it may be, the reality is we all need a bit of nannying about that. That’s why so many people are on diets. That’s a form of nanny state.

jerk

Hey Piers, you may need a bit of nannying yourself, especially when it comes to phone hacking. As for me, I’m plenty capable of making my own decisions. Why don’t you do us all a favor and take your British arse and your useless opinions back across the pond!

h/t Real Clear Politics

DCG

As if you need another reason to homeschool…

plan bNYC schools giving out tens of thousands of doses of the morning-after pill

NY Post: Plan B has become Plan A in the Bloomberg administration’s stealth war on teen pregnancy. Handouts of the “morning-after pill” to sexually active students have skyrocketed under an unpublicized project in which health centers in public schools offer girls a full menu of free birth-control drugs and devices, records obtained by The Post show.

Last September, the city revealed it had started giving out Plan B and other birth control in the nurses’ offices of 13 high schools. At the time, officials said 567 girls had gotten Plan B.

But the birth-control blitz was much bigger than the city had acknowledged. About 40 separate “school-based health centers” doled out 12,721 doses of Plan B in 2011-12, up from 10,720 in 2010-11 and 5,039 in 2009-10, according to the newly released data.

About 22,400 students sought reproductive care from January 2009 through last school year, records show. Under state law, minors don’t need parental OKs to get contraceptives.

The revelations stunned Mona Davids, president of the NYC Parents Union, whose 14-year-old attends a Manhattan high school. “I’m in shock,” she said. “What gives the mayor the right to decide, without adequate notice, to give our children drugs that will impact their bodies and their psyches? He has purposely kept the public and parents in the dark with his agenda.”

Davids, who is black, noted that most school-based health centers are in poor neighborhoods. “This was population control on blacks and Latinos without our knowledge,” she said.

Plan B, which can block pregnancy if taken up to 72 hours after sex, is just one weapon in the city Department of Health’s arsenal for its Reproductive Health Project, an internal report reveals.

Besides “emergency contraception,” about 40 school-based clinics have dispensed prescriptions for birth-control pills, intrauterine devices (IUDs), hormone-delivering injections and Patch and NuvaRing — covering a total 93,569 monthly cycles through June 2012, the report says.

The Post obtained the report under a Freedom of Information Law request.

Handouts of birth-control packets rose from 6,027 in 2009-10 to 10,462 last year. Depo-Provera injections rose from 1,213 to 2,117. Staffers also insert plastic IUDs in the uterus, where they can remain for years. Officials refused to discuss the project.

The city says about 6,300 NYC girls had unplanned pregnancies last year, and more than half had abortions. Of those who give birth, the city says, about 70 percent drop out of school, making their futures bleak.

The city “has been able to place NYC public high school [health centers] on the forefront of the delivery of sexual and reproductive health services,” the report says. The city Bureau of Maternal, Infant and Reproductive Health launched the project with a grant from the Fund for Public Health in New York. The school-based health centers run under contract with local hospitals. The city spent $2.7 million on the centers this fiscal year.

Students without health insurance get the birth control free of charge. A city-founded nonprofit prescription service, NYCRx, reimbursed the centers $390,861 for contraceptives last school year, the report says.

Nanny Bloomberg is such a hypocrite. He wants to control your guns, the amount of soda you drink, and your salt intake, yet has no problem dishing out drugs to children without parents’ consent? Good little commie Bloomberg is, just following their goals for America.

DCG

Couple fined for rescuing baby deer

deer

Indiana couple fights charges over rescuing injured baby deer

Fox News: Jeff Counceller says a dying fawn he found on someone’s porch three years ago surely wouldn’t have lived had he and his wife not nursed it back to health on their eastern Indiana farm. The Connersville police officer insists they had no clue that they could be breaking the law.

The couple’s good deed put them at odds with the state Department of Natural  Resources, and prosecutors earlier this month charged Jeff and Jennifer Counceller with illegal possession of a white-tailed deer, a misdemeanor that carries up to 60 days in jail and a $500 fine.

Counceller said they plan to fight the charges, even though it might be cheaper and easier to just pay the fine. If their burgeoning legion of online  supporters is any indication, public opinion is very much on the couple’s  side.

Counceller told The Indianapolis Star that he found the deer in 2010 curled  up on a front porch with maggot-infested puncture wounds, so he brought it back to his family’s 17-acre farm to try to save it. The couple named the fawn Dani and kept it in a fenced enclosure.

Jeff Counceller said he and his wife didn’t know it was illegal to keep the deer, and that returning it to the wild when they were told to do so “would have  been a death sentence.”

A probable cause affidavit said Jennifer Counceller told a conservation officer that she eventually realized she needed a permit to keep the deer, but didn’t contact officials because she realized they would “put it down.”

Jeff Counceller didn’t immediately respond to a Tuesday phone message left by  The Associated Press seeking comment. Jennifer Counceller’s voicemail wasn’t  accepting new messages.

DNR spokesman Lt. Bill Browne said the agency had received a lot of phone  calls and email about the charges, but he declined to comment about the case and instead referred the AP to the agency’s claims in the court documents.

The deer’s story went viral online this week after a sympathetic Indianapolis  man, John Waudby, set up a Facebook page to rally support for the  Councellers.

“I heard about it early Saturday morning when I got home,” said Waudby, a  41-year-old warehouse worker. “I saw it on the news and was outraged. I was like, you’ve got to be kidding me. They’re not criminals. They were trying to do the right thing,” he  added.

The Facebook page, “Drop Charges Against Connersville Police Officer,” had  more than 15,000 “likes” by mid-afternoon Tuesday and was growing by about 1,000  an hour. Waudby said he had hoped to reach perhaps 1,000 local people to put  pressure on prosecutors to drop the charges, but was receiving responses from as  far away as Argentina and Australia. He was also circulating an online petition and by noon, the petition had topped 8,000 signatures. More than 135 people had  signed up online to attend the Councellers’ trial on March 7 in Fayette  County.

“It’s like a wildfire that you just can’t stop at this point,” Waudby said,  adding that he’s only slept for about 10 hours, total, in the three days since  launching his online campaign.

The Councellers said they had intended to release the deer once it was strong enough to survive on its own. They tried to find it a home at animal rescue operations, petting zoos and deer farms, but no one would take it. According to  court records, Jeff Counceller texted a conservation officer and urged DNR not  to kill the deer, saying “it’s not the deer’s fault.”

Last summer, the deer vanished on the day that the DNR planned to euthanize  it, following the denial of the couple’s request for a rescue permit.

The DNR website includes a section on wildlife rehabilitation that warns people who find wild animals to make sure they are really abandoned and if they are, to contact a licensed wildlife rehabilitator. The closest rehabilitators to  Connersville are in neighboring Wayne County, according to a list on the  website.

Removing wildlife from the environment is prohibited by state regulations without a proper handling permit,” the DNR website warns, adding that most young  animals that appear to be abandoned don’t require help. “Wildlife can carry diseases and parasites that can be transmitted to humans, it is best to leave  them alone,” the website adds.

Kathleen Hershey, president of Utopia Wildlife, a wildlife rehabilitation center near Hope in south-central Indiana, said even though the Councellers  meant well, it’s bad for a deer to become acclimated to humans because they can  become too trusting and easy prey for hunters.

“They have real serious social needs, and you can’t just raise a deer. They have to be in with others of their kind,” she said. “It has to learn how to  live in a herd and that’s where its safety is.”

Most of the Facebook posts expressed disbelief that the couple could face  charges for what was perceived as a good deed, but some comments weren’t so  sympathetic.

One post pointed out that the couple had exposed themselves, their children  and their pets to disease carried by deer, and that the local deer population could be infected now that the animal is free.

Although lawyer’s fees would be more expensive than paying the fine, the  Councellers said they plan to fight the charge. “Sometimes, it’s not always about the DNR laws,” Jennifer Counceller told the  Star. “Sometimes it’s about common sense and what’s right in God’s eyes. And that’s what I’m going to stand for.”

Waudby said he plans to attend the Councellers’ court hearings, “and I’m  bringing thousands of people with me.”

If DNR was going to put the deer down and the Councellers couldn’t find anyone to take it, what’s the problem with them keeping it on their farm? Remember the good ol’ days when people were able to help one another (and animals) without big brother trying to control us? Those days are long gone, unfortunately.

DCG

Good Idea or Violation of Fourth Amendment?

guntech24n-2-web

NYPD Commissioner says department  will begin testing  a new high-tech device that scans for concealed  weapons

NY Post: Get ready for scan-and-frisk. The NYPD will soon deploy new technology allowing police to detect guns  carried by criminals without using the typical pat-down procedure, Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly said Wednesday.

The department just received a machine that reads terahertz — the natural  energy emitted by people and inanimate objects — and allows police to view  concealed weapons from a distance. “If something is obstructing the flow of that radiation, for example a weapon, the device will highlight that object,” Kelly said.

A video image aired at a Police Foundation breakfast Wednesday showed an  officer, clad in a New York Jets jersey and jeans, with the shape of a hidden  gun clearly visible under his clothing when viewed through the device.

The department will begin testing the high-tech device for use on the street. The device is small enough to be placed in a police vehicle or stationed  at a street corner where gunplay has occurred in the past.

Kelly, who first discussed the possibility of using this technology last  year, said the NYPD has been working with the London Metropolitan Police and a  contractor “to develop a tool that meets our requirements.” “We took delivery of it last week,” Kelly said at the gathering at the  Waldorf Astoria. “One of our requirements was that the technology must be  portable.”

“We still have a number of trials to run before we can determine how best to deploy this technology. We’re also talking to our legal staff about this. But we’re very pleased with the progress we’ve made over the past year.”

The New York Civil Liberties Union last year raised concerns about “virtual  pat downs,” and some security experts have said false positives could lead to  unjustified stops.

I’m not sure about this. Seems to me it violates our Fourth Amendment:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

The Fourth Amendment was intended to create a constitutional buffer between U.S. citizens and the intimidating power of law enforcement. It has three components. First, it establishes a privacy interest by recognizing the right of U.S. citizens to be “secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects.” Second, it protects this privacy interest by prohibiting searches and seizures that are “unreasonable” or are not authorized by a warrant based upon probable cause. Third, it states that no warrant may be issued to a law enforcement officer unless that warrant describes with particularity “the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

I thought the TSA scanners violated our Fourth Amendment too yet that didn’t stop the federal government from implementing them anyway.

What do you think?

DCG

You need a permit to help the homeless in Seattle

Control...

Control…

Charity told to stop serving food to homeless in city parks

KOMO: Hot meals served to the city’s homeless have now become a hot-button issue after a local charity was told to stop doing it in city parks.

“Why now? What did we do wrong? 3 years, no one said anything,” said Willie Parish, Jr., executive director of the Bread of Life Mission. “We’re meeting needs, people are happy.”

The Mission, a local faith-based charity for 74 years, serves three meals a day to hundreds of homeless from its Pioneer Square headquarters. Once a month, every third Saturday, the non-profit heads to City Hall Park to hand out food and water to the homeless outside the county courthouse (“drive-by foodings,” the charity called it).

In October, city workers approached Mission volunteers and asked them to stop, Parish said. “We’re just trying to help, and I don’t understand why the city want to interfere with an organization that’s been around since 1939,” he added. “I’d think they’d want to get onboard and encourage us to help.”

The primary issue is that the Mission didn’t have a permit to serve food outdoors, said David Takami, spokesman for the Seattle Human Services Department, which oversees homeless issues in the city. The secondary issue is with food safety and the safety of volunteers, he added.

“We certainly appreciate that good (they’re doing) and their work,” Takami said. “But this has been the case where there are a lot of meals served at one time to the same population on the same day. It creates a possible food waste issue, garbage, and in that case a rodent issue.

Takami said the city is working with the Mission and encouraging it to partner with existing groups, such as OSL, which has been serving meals underneath the interstate at 6th and Cherry for years.

“We wash the site, we wash the benches, we make sure it’s as safe as possible,” said Beverly Graham, who founded the group, which started serving meals in local parks decades ago. “When you’re serving somebody in a park you don’t know where they’re taking that trash and that garbage, so that’s very difficult.”

“It just is a better way to make use of people’s good intentions,” added Leslie Smith of the Pioneer Square Alliance. “People come downtown with good intentions, but it makes messes in parks, there are issues of food health practices, safety, etc. What the city’s trying to do is to use the good intentions of volunteers to use their best.”

Parish said he understands the concern, but after serving the city of generations, just can’t get past how serving meals could stir up so much controversy. “We’ll do whatever they want us to do, but let us serve. We serve 300 meals a day here (indoors),” he said. “I’d think they’d want to get onboard and encourage us to help.”

City officials are concerned about trash, rats, and safety? Where were they when Occupy Seattle turds trashed Seattle Community College with drug use, drinking, trash and rats on campus?

And why, after three years of serving the homeless, has the City now started to notice? The homeless and rodents have been in that area for plenty of years. Sounds like nothing more than the City trying to garner more revenue through a permit.

DCG

 

John Boehner is a Spineless Pussy

Little wonder this country is screwed, and even less of a wonder why this pr*ck of a POtuS is smiling:

Obama_laughing

Limp-wristed girly-man that apparently has Rep. Boehner by the proverbial short hairs

And would somebody please remind me just why, exactly, we even need a republican party, given that the repube “leadership” jackasses have now rid themselves of their elephant suits?

And we’re going to fix this in November of 2014?

Right.

-Dave

Obama administration promotes welfare to new immigrants

Yet more evidence Obama and the Democrats are hellbent on bankrupting the United States.

America’s national debt now exceeds $16 trillion and this country’s annual gross national product. After four years of Obama as President, more Americans than ever are on food stamps and Social Security Disability. The POS even gutted Bill Clinton’s work requirement for welfare.

But even all that isn’t enough. The Obama administration wants even more welfare dependents and is actively promoting welfare to new immigrants to America.      

 

Caroline May reports for The Daily Caller, Nov. 18, 2012, that “Welcome to USA.gov,” a website maintained by the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to provide “basic information on how to settle in the United States” to new immigrants, prominently features a section on how new immigrants can access “government benefits” taxpayer-funded welfare.

The web page reads:

“Depending on your immigration status, length of time in the United States, and income, you may be eligible for some federal benefit programs. Government assistance programs can be critically important to the well-being of some immigrants and their families. Frequently, however, there is a lack of information about how to access such benefits. Benefit programs can be complicated and you may be given misleading information about how they operate.”

Then the DHS page helpfully gives the links to government websites that explain how to access benefits including food stamps, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Medicaid, Medicare, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) and the “official website with information on all available federal benefit programs,” with a nonworking link to Benefits.gov.

WelcometoUSA.gov also boasts to immigrants that “[f]ree public education for children is one reason many immigrants come to the United States.”

Still doubt that Obama and the Dems are following the diabolical Cloward-Piven Strategy?

~Eowyn

Seattle receives permission to start using drones

As FOTM reported in April, there are 63 active drone sites in the US. The unmanned planes – some of which may have been designed to kill terror suspects – are being launched from locations in 20 states. Most of the active drones are deployed from military installations, enforcement agencies and border patrol teams, according to the Federal Aviation Authority. The feds are now giving public agencies the authority to place them into action.

Drone sites across the US.

Seattle police drafting policy for using drones

KOMO News:   The Seattle Police Department is one of the first in the nation to receive permission from the federal government to start using drones. The department is drafting a policy on how it will use the remote control aerial vehicles.

The public will have a chance to comment at a question-and-answer session Thursday at 6 p.m. at the Garfield Community Center, 2323 East Cherry Street, Seattle.

Seattle Police Lt. Greg Sackman will be on hand with the drone to answer questions and receive feedback about the proposed policy. Police have said they expect to use drones in search and rescue, accidents and natural disasters, and unusual crime scenes.

Seattle police plan to use the mini-helicopter Draganflyer XG made by the Draganfly Innovations company of Saskatoon, Canada. It is operated with a hand-held controller and joysticks. It carries cameras that can take still pictures, videos and infrared shots. It is limited by a battery life of less than 10 minutes and an inability to carry more than 35 ounces – a little more than 2 pounds, police said.

The FAA has guidelines on how and when law-enforcement agencies can use drones. They cannot be flown at night or over crowds. The drones must be flown below 400 feet and must remain within eyesight of an operator as well as an observer at all times, according to the FAA.

The law enforcement use of drones prompted an American Civil Liberties Union review that found existing laws and policies are inadequate to safeguard citizen privacy.

Drones must remain within eyesight of an operator? I find that interesting as I live approximately 15 miles outside of Seattle and have seen drones flying over residential areas on two occasions.  If the drones I saw were owned by Seattle Police, how could an operator see it so far outside of city limits? Why were the drones flying outside of Seattle?

And if the drones I saw weren’t owned by Seattle Police, then what agency was flying them?

“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” Benjamin Franklin

DCG