Is that they not not only confuse us, but the courts as well.
Arizona judge isn’t convinced the pregnant man is a man, delaying divorce
Arizona does not recognize gay marriage, which is what a judge considers the union of Thomas and Nancy Beatie, so the couple isn’t even sure they can get a divorce just yet.
NY Daily News: For some people, the difficult is simple and the simple is difficult. The “pregnant man” now faces challenges in getting a divorce, just as
he she had in getting married. At least, getting pregnant came easily for him her.
An Arizona judge isn’t convinced he can divorce the pregnant man Thomas Beatie from
his her wife because he doesn’t consider the transgender man, well, a man. Since Arizona doesn’t recognize gay marriage, the judge argues that he doesn’t have the authority to divorce a couple that – in his estimation – was never married in the first place, reports TMZ.
Beatie underwent a country and state-recognized sex change operation in 1998 but retained
his her female reproductive organs. Beatie’s U.S. passport and Hawaii birth certificate were altered to identify Beatie as man. In 2003, he she and Nancy wed as man and woman. But because Beatie had a vagina at the time of their marriage and has given birth to three children, the judge isn’t entirely convinced by the paperwork.
The pregnant man is seeking a divorce from
his her wife Nancy because she allegedly abused him while inebriated. Beatie said, “She hit me in the crotch.”
The judge is still deliberating as to whether he has the authority to grant the divorce.
Dude, if you have a vagina you are a woman. Just imagine the mess these “transgender” divorces are going to cause in a courtroom.