Once again I do not have all the info needed to say yea or nay on this tragedy. I figured I would just add this new info to the already murky waters. Really muddle it up. Does bring up good point though on whether Angela Corey, the prosecutor had access to pic before charging with 2nd degree murder.
—————————— Steve ———————————————-
With ABC News’ release of the George Zimmerman photo showing blood flowing freely from his head, the question becomes whether Angela Corey, the prosecutor in the case, had access to the photo before charging Zimmerman with second-degree murder.

The arrest affidavit did not mention the photograph, or the bleeding, gashes, and bruises on Zimmermans’ head. Professor Alan Dershowitz of Harvard Law School stated upon release of the arrest affidavit that it was “so thin that it won’t make it past a judge on a second degree murder charge … everything in the affidavit is completely consistent with a defense of self-defense.”
After the release of the photo, however, Dershowitz went much further, telling Breitbart News that if the prosecutors did have the photo and didn’t mention it in the affidavit, that would constitute a “grave ethical violation,” since affidavits are supposed to contain “all relevant information.”
Dershowitz continued, “An affidavit that willfully misstates undisputed evidence known to the prosecution is not only unethical but borders on perjury because an affiant swears to tell not only the truth, but the whole truth, and suppressing an important part of the whole truth is a lie.”
When asked if it made a difference whether the prosecution had the bloody photograph at the time they charged Zimmerman, Dershowitz responded, “We do know that there were earlier photographs before the affidavit was done that strongly suggested blood on the back of the head, and we know the police had first access to him, so if there was blood they [the prosecution] would know about it …
“I’ve had cases in Florida against prosecutors,” Dershowitz said, “and this is not the first time they have willfully omitted exculpatory evidence. It’s a continuing problem. Here, it’s not only immoral, but stupid. The whole country is watching. What do they benefit from having half-truths in an affidavit?”
Dershowitz added, “I’m not taking sides, but I’m insisting that both sides play by the rules, and so far the prosecution is not playing by the rules.”
H/T Big Government
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/04/20/Dershowitz-prosecution-immoral

The affidavit filed was done so not so much as to comply with law but rather to meet a political agenda….pretty much like everything this admin does.
Shabazz will never be arrested, not part of the DOJ’s agenda.
MLK would be so sad to see what is going on in our country today
I watched the bail hearing live yesterday via the Internet, and I was struck by the fact that the so-called investigator hadn’t even bothered to look into Zimmerman’s medical records as they pertain to his injuries in this matter.
I find that not a little curious, given that they have to know his defense attorney is most definitely going to produce them in court.
It will be very interesting to see what all comes out when (if) this case goes to trial, as I have a strong suspician that the facts are going to bear little resemblance to what most of the Obama-loving MSM has been reporting.
-Dave
My thoughts exactly…
Facts, evidence, rule of law? Bah, there’s social justice to be had!